This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Fair Credit Reporting Act
Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices Affecting Commerce

United States of America v. Sprint Corporation

Published: Mar. 5, 2016 | Result Date: Jan. 8, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:15-cv-09340-CM-TJJ Settlement –  $2,950,000

Court

USDC Kansas


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Christopher Allman

Matthew J. Wilshire
(Federal Trade Commission)

Kerala T. Cowart

Duane C. Pozza


Defendant

John E. Villafranco
(Kelley, Drye & Warren LLP)

Alysa Z. Hutnik
(Kelley, Drye & Warren LLP)


Facts

The Federal Trade Commission brought a complaint under the FTC Act against mobile phone and data plan provider Sprint Corporation for civil penalties, permanent injunction, and other equitable relief.

Contentions

COMPLAINANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The FTC contended that Sprint failed to give consumers proper notice that they had been placed in a program for customers with lower credit scores and charged an extra monthly fee of $7.99 in addition to charges for cell phone and data services.

Result

Pursuant to the settlement reached between the parties, Sprint will pay $2.95 million in civil penalties. It must also provide required notices to consumers within five days of signing up for Sprint service or by a date that gives them the opportunity to avoid the recurring charges.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Oct. 21, 2015.


#108999

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390