This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Vehicular)
Auto v. Truck
Negligence

Carol Seigelton v. Giles Construction, Inc., et al.

Published: Apr. 24, 1999 | Result Date: Jan. 29, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: C321254 –  $135,000

Judge

Christopher Browning

Court

Pima Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

William M. Bache


Defendant

Tom Althaus


Experts

Plaintiff

Brad Barnett
(medical)

Thomas M. Butler
(Law Offices of Muhar, Garber, Av & Duncan) (medical)

Robert Crago
(medical)

Michael Duperret
(medical)

Barbara Bode
(medical)

G. Michael German
(medical)

Defendant

Lidia Fortuny
(medical)

Facts

On Aug. 11, 1995, plaintiff Carol Seigelton, a 45-year-old teacher, was rear ended by defendant's pick up truck and propelled forward into the rear of the car in front. Property damage was $7,234.92. Negligence was admitted. The plaintiff braced for the impact by tightly gripping the steering wheel. Her head hit the headrest. She was taken to a hospital emergency room with head, neck and back pain, examined and released. On the way home from the hospital, she was confused and distracted and complained of pain in her hands. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant based on negligence.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand of $50,000 (disputed). The defendant offered $30,000.

Specials in Evidence

$24,460 (disputed) $1,200 (disputed) $20,000 (disputed)

Other Information

In closing argument, the plaintiff requested her past and future medical bills, her lost income and reasonable compensation for her past and future pain and suffering and disability. The defendant asked them to return a verdict for the defendant since none of the plaintiff's alleged conditions had been caused by the collision. Alternatively, the defendant argued that if an award was made to plaintiff, it should be in the area of $5,000-$6,000.

Deliberation

1 1/2 hours

Length

four days


#109927

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390