Abel C. Crespo and Eva A. Crespo v. Morgan Stanley DW Inc.
Published: Dec. 16, 2006 | Result Date: May 9, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 05-03396 Arbitration – $272,624
Court
Arbitration Forum
Attorneys
Claimant
Marc I. Zussman
(Law Office of Marc I. Zussman)
Respondent
Ronald E. Wood
(Brown White & Osborn LLP)
Facts
Claimants Abel and Eva Crespo filed a claim against Morgan Stanley DW Inc. involving several technology stocks. Their claim was heard by a NASD Dispute Resolution Panel.
Contentions
CLAIMANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Claimants alleged unsuitability, churning, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and failure to supervise. They also claimed violations of federal and state securities laws, NASD contract rules, and NYSE rules. Claimants alleged breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty as well.
RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:
Respondents denied the allegations of wrongdoing and asserted various affirmative defenses.
Damages
Claimants requested $401,594.43 in compensatory damages, punitive damages, lost opportunity costs, interest, costs, attorney fees, and the disgorgement of all profits generated from their portfolio, including commissions and fees.
Result
Claimants were awarded $272,624, as four separate awards. For Abel Crespo one award was for $48,000 and the other was for $85,200. He was not awarded interest on the awards. For, Eva Crespo one award was for $6,190 and the other was for $63,522. She was awarded interest at four percent per annum on the sum of $69,712 from Oct. 31, 2000 until Aug. 31, 2004. The motions for sanctions were denied. The parties each bore their respective costs.
Other Information
The arbitration panel consisted of: Thomas E. Shuck, William David Wells and Michael M. Perrigue.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390