This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
NASD
Breach

Abel C. Crespo and Eva A. Crespo v. Morgan Stanley DW Inc.

Published: Dec. 16, 2006 | Result Date: May 9, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 05-03396 Arbitration –  $272,624

Court

Arbitration Forum


Attorneys

Claimant

Marc I. Zussman
(Law Office of Marc I. Zussman)


Respondent

Ronald E. Wood
(Brown White & Osborn LLP)

Christine A. Pham


Facts

Claimants Abel and Eva Crespo filed a claim against Morgan Stanley DW Inc. involving several technology stocks. Their claim was heard by a NASD Dispute Resolution Panel.

Contentions

CLAIMANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Claimants alleged unsuitability, churning, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and failure to supervise. They also claimed violations of federal and state securities laws, NASD contract rules, and NYSE rules. Claimants alleged breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty as well.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:
Respondents denied the allegations of wrongdoing and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Damages

Claimants requested $401,594.43 in compensatory damages, punitive damages, lost opportunity costs, interest, costs, attorney fees, and the disgorgement of all profits generated from their portfolio, including commissions and fees.

Result

Claimants were awarded $272,624, as four separate awards. For Abel Crespo one award was for $48,000 and the other was for $85,200. He was not awarded interest on the awards. For, Eva Crespo one award was for $6,190 and the other was for $63,522. She was awarded interest at four percent per annum on the sum of $69,712 from Oct. 31, 2000 until Aug. 31, 2004. The motions for sanctions were denied. The parties each bore their respective costs.

Other Information

The arbitration panel consisted of: Thomas E. Shuck, William David Wells and Michael M. Perrigue.


#110439

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390