This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
NASD
Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Brian Barsky v. Wells Fargo Investments, LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, Inc. and Anthony P. Brookfield

Published: Dec. 23, 2006 | Result Date: Oct. 13, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 04-05778 Arbitration –  $375

Court

Arbitration Forum


Attorneys

Claimant

Jay T. Jambeck
(Leigh Law Group PC)


Respondent

Thomas F. Kopshever
(Wells Fargo Law Dept.)


Facts

Claimant Brian Barsky filed a complaint against Wells Fargo Investments LLC, Wells Fargo Securities Inc. and Anthony P. Brookfield. The allegations involved various unspecified securities in money managed accounts. The dispute was heard by an NASD Arbitration Board.

Contentions

CONTENTIONS:
Claimant alleged breach of written contract, breach of fiduciary duty, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, unfair competition, violation of federal securities laws, negligence and respondeat superior. Respondents denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Damages

Claimant requested $600,000 in compensatory damages, $150,000 in punitive damages, restitution of all fees, and costs. Respondents requested dismissal of claimant's claims, expungement of reference to the claim from Brookfield's NASD records, and costs.

Result

Claimants claims were denied, however Wells Fargo Investments LLC was liable to claimant for $375 as reimbursement for filing costs. The parties each bore their remaining costs. Brookfield's request for expungement was denied. According to respondent, this was a split decision as the three member arbitration panel voted two to one in favor of respondents.

Other Information

Respondents' motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations was denied.


#110547

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390