This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Consumer Law
Consumers Legal Remedies Act
False Advertising

Kim Allen, Daniele Xenos, Roger Hutchinson, Melissa Nigh, Sherrell Smith, Yuanke Xu, Diana Sisti and Nancy Rodriguez on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and the general public v. Hyland's Inc., Standard Homeopathic Company

Published: Nov. 7, 2015 | Result Date: Oct. 16, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:12-cv-01150-DMG-MAN Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Scott A. Bursor
(Bursor & Fisher PA)

Ronald A. Marron
(Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron APLC)

Gretchen M. Nelson
(Nelson & Fraenkel LLP)

Alexis Wood

Beatrice Skye Resendes
(Watkins Firm APC)

Lawrence T. Fisher

Christopher B. Hayes

Stuart R. Fraenkel
(Nelson & Fraenkel LLP)

Gabriel S. Barenfeld
(Nelson & Fraenkel LLP)


Defendant

Jade Jurdi
(Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP)

Jeffrey B. Margulies
(Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP)

Spencer S. Persson
(Davis, Wright & Tremaine LLP)

Stephanie A. Stroup
(Federal Express Corp.)


Facts

Kim Allen and a group of other consumers brought a nationwide class action lawsuit against manufacturer and seller of homeopathic products Hyland's Inc. and its parent company Standard Homeopathic Co. regarding the advertising claims of 12 of defendants' products. The products included Calms Forte, Teething Tablets, Migraine Headache Relief, ClearAc, Poison Ivy/Oak Tablets, Colic Tablets, Leg Cramps with Quinine, Leg Cramps, Defend Cough & Cold, Defend Cold & Cough Night, Hyland's Cough, and Seasonal Allergy Relief.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS CONTENTIONS:
Allen claimed that she purchased certain homeopathic remedies, which were advertised as providing effective relief for various ailments, but that the products did not work. Other plaintiffs alleged similar experiences. They contended that defendants falsely and deceptively advertised the products as effective for various ailments when they were nothing more than placebos or sugar pills. They alleged, among other claims, breach of express warranty and violation of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought $255 million in damages.

Result

The jury returned a defense verdict on plaintiffs' breach of warranty and California Consumers Legal Remedies Act claims for 10 of the products. The court will determine equitable claims and remedies for alleged violations of the Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Feb. 9, 2012.


#110667

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390