This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
CERCLA
Contaminated Soil and Groundwater

United States of America and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Shell Oil Company

Published: Nov. 7, 2015 | Result Date: Sep. 29, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:15-cv-07619-R-AGR Settlement –  $55,000,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Sarah E. Morrison
(Office of the Attorney General)

Mark A. Rigau
(U.S. Dept. of Justice)

John C. Cruden

Valerie K. Mann

Megan K. Hey
(Office of the Attorney General)

Kamala D. Harris

Sally Magnani
(Office of the Attorney General)

Mark J. Breckler


Defendant

Michael R. Leslie
(King & Spalding)


Facts

The United States of America, on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, brought civil actions pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act for injunctive relief and recovery of costs against Shell Oil Co. The suit was related to the cleanup and containment of hazardous substances at Operable Unit 1 at the Del Amo Superfund site in Los Angeles.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The government contended that the site used to include a synthetic rubber manufacturing plant in operation from around 1942 to 1972 that released hazardous substances into the environment. Plaintiffs contended that during the time Shell owned or operated the site hazardous substances were disposed of on certain parts of the site. EPA contended that it incurred at least $1,547,629 in unreimbursed response costs by responding to the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at the site. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control also alleged that Shell was liable to it for reimbursement costs the department incurred or will incur for response actions at the site. They sought to hold Shell responsible for such costs.

Result

Shell Oil Co. entered into a settlement, in the form of a consent decree, agreeing to implement the cleanup work selected by EPA to address contamination at Operable Unit 1 of the Del Amo Site. The settlement further provides for Shell to pay EPA and California DTSC for past response costs in the amount of $1,263,993.81, and for future response costs of overseeing the implementation of the remedial action. The proposed settlement includes the U.S. General Services Administration as a settling federal agency as the successor to the former federal government owners of the synthetic rubber plant, and provides that the United States will reimburse Shell for a portion of the costs. Defendants also agreed to establish and maintain a performance guarantee, initially in the amount of $53,893,000, for the cleanup program and payment of the EPA and the state's oversight costs.


#110690

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390