This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Medical Malpractice

Jeanette Johntee and Lary Johntee v. Michael Jefferson, M.D.

Published: Apr. 29, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: PC033371 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior San Fernando


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gerard L. Friend
(Law Office of Gerard L. Friend)

Samuel O. Ogbogu
(Law Office of Samuel O. Ogbogu)


Defendant

Robert C. Reback
(Reback, McAndrews & Blessey LLP)

David J. Rubaum
(Reback, McAndrews, Kjar, Warford & Stockalper LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Charles J. Furst Ph.D., ABCN
(medical)

Emil Soorani
(medical)

Edwin Matias
(medical)

Moshen Hamza
(medical)

Defendant

David J. Paster
(medical)

Michael A. Gold
(Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP) (medical)

Julian Gold
(medical)

Facts

This action involved the alleged negligent administration of spinal anesthesia resulting in respiratory arrest and alleged hypoxic brain injury.

Plaintiff Jeanette was pregnant and went into premature labor. She was admitted to Northridge Medical Center under the care of Dr. Alinsod. Attempts were made to keep the fetus in utero to allow development of the fetal lungs. After the fetus suffered cardiac decelerations, it was determined that an urgent cesarean section would be performed.

Dr. Jefferson was the on-call anesthesiologist who had evaluated Ms. Johntee earlier that day regarding anesthesia. He decided that spinal anesthesia would be the most appropriate method of anesthesia for this particular patient.

Shortly after spinal anesthesia was administered, the patient became hypotensive and suffered respiratory arrest. The patient was resuscitated and then intubated by Dr. Jefferson and taken to the intensive care unit. Neurology work up indicated mild hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy with good prognositic signs.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that general or epidural anesthesia was required by the standard of care and that spinal anesthesia was contraindicated due to the patient's fluid overload status.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Dr. Jefferson contended that this patient was a high risk anesthesia patient given her premature labor, age, history of smoking, obesity, and short neck. It was his opinion that spinal anesthesia was the most appropriate method of anesthesia for the situation. Ms. Johntee's arrest, while unfortunate, was not the result of any act or omission by Dr. Jefferson. Moreover, Dr. Jefferson contended that Ms. Johntee did not suffer any injury.

Settlement Discussions

There were no demands and no offers.

Specials in Evidence

$500,000.

Damages

Plaintiff claimed she suffered a mild brain injury which caused short term memory loss and problems with executive functioning.

Other Information

PLEASE PROVIDE RESULT DATE _________________________ PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATION OF EACH EXPERT I.E., CITY AND STATE THANK YOU

Deliberation

approximately 30 minutes.

Poll

11-1

Length

6.5 days


#110834

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390