This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dangerous Condition of Public Property
Negligent Maintenance, Inspection and Repair

Thomas Hebert v. City of Los Angeles, APL Limited

Published: Oct. 29, 2011 | Result Date: Oct. 11, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: NC043304 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior San Pedro


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dennis M. Elber


Defendant

Glen R. Piper

Jennifer M. Porter

Albert E. Peacock III
(Peacock Piper Tong & Voss LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Mark A. Johnson
(technical)

Steven Wiker
(technical)

Defendant

Genevieve M. Heckman
(technical)

Gary T. Yamaguchi
(technical)

George Reiss
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff Thomas Herbert, a longshoreman, alleged damages from a trip and fall incident, which occurred at a marine terminal in the Port of Los Angeles.

City of Los Angeles owned the premises, which were under the long-term lease agreement with plaintiff's employer, Eagle Marine Services Ltd. At the time of the incident, defendant APL Limited regularly had vessels calling at the terminal for stevedoring operations. As such, the terminal was often referred to as the APL Terminal.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that the marine terminal was in a dangerous condition as a result of defendant's negligent maintenance, inspection and repair. Plaintiff claimed that APL controlled the terminal even though it was not the tenant.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
City of Los Angeles and APL claimed that they were not responsible for the maintenance, inspection or repair of the paving of the premises. The premises were not in a dangerous condition at the time of incident, and even if it had been, neither the city nor APL had notice of the dangerous condition or a duty to repair.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff's lowest demand was $3 million. Defendants' highest offer was $50,000.

Injuries

Plaintiff suffered two cervical spine surgeries, left knee replacement surgery, and various other injuries. Plaintiff alleged that he would not be able to return to work.

Result

Defense verdict for City of Los Angeles and APL Limited.

Other Information

Trial was bifurcated on liability and damages. FILING DATE: Nov. 17, 2009.

Deliberation

6.75 hours

Length

nine days


#111230

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390