Na Zhang v. Roes
Published: Nov. 5, 2011 | Result Date: Oct. 6, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: RIC10007432 Settlement – $3,200,000
Court
Riverside Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Stephen J. Estey
(Estey & Bomberger LLP)
R. Michael Bomberger
(Estey & Bomberger LLP)
Defendant
Michael A. Portigal
(Law Offices of Vivian L. Schwartz)
Robert T. Bergsten
(Hosp, Gilbert & Bergsten)
Experts
Plaintiff
Forrest E. Folck
(technical)
Richard A. Schmidt
(technical)
Jan Joseph Bejar
(technical)
Defendant
Thomas F. Fugger Jr., P.E.
(technical)
Robin T. Harrison
(technical)
Anthony C. Stein Ph.D.
(technical)
Steven Molina Ph.D.
(technical)
Ted Vavoulis
(technical)
Frederick B. Benson
(technical)
Facts
On Oct. 19, 2009, at 3:30 a.m., decedent's vehicle was stopped in the number one lane of westbound I-60 with no lights on when defendant struck decedent's vehicle from behind. Decedent was a 33 year old graduate chemistry student was days away from earning his Ph.D. Plaintiff, Na Zhang, is the widow of decedent.
Defendant admitted to exceeding the posted speed limit and violating the California Vehicle Code.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that decedent's vehicle malfunctioned or died through no fault of the decedent and that the decedent was attempting to restart his vehicle when it was hit by defendant's vehicle. Plaintiff contended that defendant was traveling too fast for the conditions and, as a result, was unable to avoid decedent's vehicle. Witnesses to the incident and plaintiff's liability expert put defendant's speed prior to the collision in excess of 100 miles per hour.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that decedent caused the collision because he stopped his vehicle on the freeway in violation of California Vehicle Code section 21718, did not activate his emergency flashers, and turned off his headlights.
Defendants further contended that decedent intentionally put his vehicle into park, removed or was not wearing a seatbelt, did not put any flares around his vehicle and that he further stopped in a dark and foggy area where there were no street lights.
Defendants claimed that decedent should have steered his vehicle over to the shoulder or, alternatively, exited his vehicle and walked over to the shoulder.
Damages
Plaintiff's expert economist calculated plaintiff's economic losses at $3,631,760.00. Defendant disputed this amount.
Result
The case settled for $3.2 million.
Other Information
FILING DATE: April 20, 2010.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390