This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Condemnation
Eminent Domain

People of the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation v. Janet Gale-Hubbard, et al.

Published: Nov. 3, 2012 | Result Date: Sep. 21, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIVDS 902596 Settlement –  $4,360,000

Court

San Bernardino Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Julie A. Del Rivo

Charles M. Belenky


Defendant

John C. Murphy
(Murphy & Evertz LLP)

Emily L. Madueno


Experts

Defendant

Robert A. Stockton
(technical)

Stephen M. Zamucen
(technical)

Len Perdue
(technical)

Richard Crockett
(technical)

Facts

Caltrans sought to condemn property for its Interstate 215 widening project in San Bernardino between the Interstate 10 and State Route 210 freeways.

On March 2, 2009, Caltrans filed a complaint in eminent domain against the H Street defendants seeking to take part of their property. The take included fee taxes and a temporary construction easement.

On Sept. 11, 2009, Caltrans amended its complaint to seek a full take of the H Street property. Then on Jan. 5, 2011, (three weeks before the originally scheduled trial date), Caltrans filed a Notice of Partial Abandonment reverting to the original part take it sought in its original complaint.

On April 20, 2011, Caltrans filed a second Notice of Partial Abandonment, reducing the take to a smaller part take. Caltrans ended up condemning approximately 44 percent of the H Street property.

Caltrans valued total compensation for the H Street defendants at $1,989,000.

The H Street defendants operated an auto-body repair shop on the property condemned by Caltrans for nearly 35 years. The H Street defendants sought just compensation totaling $5.4 million for the property taken, severance damages, cost to cure damages, fixtures and equipment, lost business goodwill, and pre-condemnation damages.

The H Street defendants argued, among other things, that Caltrans take of 44 percent of the property, ruined internal circulation on the property for the business and deprived them of room to expand.

Result

The case settled for $4 million, plus $360,000 in litigation expenses.

Other Information

FILING DATE: March 2, 2009.


#111592

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390