This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Construction Contract
Negligence; Defects and Delays

Valley Commercial Contractors, LLP v. Windsor Walnut Creek Apartments, LLC; Windsor Capital Group Inc.; and Tarigo Properties, LLC

Published: Dec. 14, 2013 | Result Date: Sep. 4, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIVMSC 08-02958 Verdict –  $1,868,760

Court

Contra Costa Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven W. Yuen
(Heath & Yuen, APC)

William S. Kronenberg
(Kronenberg Law PC)


Defendant

Allan B. Cooper

Barry J. MacNaughton

Laura D. Cason

Carl S. Paganelli


Experts

Plaintiff

Joel Agnello
(technical)

Defendant

Scott Layne
(technical)

Facts

In 2005, Valley Commercial Contractors LLP agreed to build a 125-unit luxury apartment building called the Windsor Apartments, for Windsor Walnut Creek Apartments LLC and Windsor Capital Group Inc. After the agreement setbacks such as, delays in permitting, unfinished design work and changes to the project occurred.

In 2008, the parties decided on a new date for completion of the building, along with an updated timetable for payments. However, by June 2008, Windsor delivered a "Stop Work Notice" to Valley, which took Valley off of the project entirely. Windsor then continued the project until its completion with a different company. Valley filed suit against Windsor Capital and Windsor Walnut Creek Apartments LLC.

Windsor filed a cross-complaint.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Valley alleged Windsor breached their agreement. Valley argued a delay in construction occurred because of Windsor's numerous changes to the incomplete construction design, which included 470 information requests and 85 supplemental instructions. Further, Valley argued that Windsor's project director agreed to a contract amendment, which set forth an updated payment plan, but Windsor never made one payment on it, breaching the agreement.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Windsor claimed plaintiff breached their agreement in the cross-complaint, and caused construction defects and delays.

Settlement Discussions

Windsor demanded $3.995 million for the alleged defects and delays, and offered $0 to Valley on its claims. Valley offered $425,001, and to dismiss its claims to Windsor under CCP section 998, and demanded $299,000 from Tarigo under CCP section 998.

Damages

Valley requested $840,000 due to breach of contract and $1,028,763 in quantum meruit. Windsor sought $6 million based on breach of contract, and construction defects and delays.

Result

The jury awarded Valley $840,000 for breach of contract and $1,028,763 in quantum meruit, jointly against Windsor Walnut Creek Apartments, LLC, and Windsor Capitol Group, Inc. The jury awarded $0 to Windsor Walnut Creek Apartments, LLC on its claims against Valley.

Deliberation

13 hours

Poll

12-0

Length

39 days


#111894

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390