This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Edward Fields, et al. v. Wise Media LLC, Mobile Messenger Americas Inc., MBLox Inc., Motricity Inc., and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Dec. 14, 2013 | Result Date: Nov. 18, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:12-cv-05160-WHA Bench Decision –  Class Certification Denied

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John J. Roddy

Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld
(Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP)

Virginia A. Sanderson

Elizabeth Ryan

Karl S. Kronenberger
(Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP )


Defendant

Matthew F. Miller
(DLA Piper US)

Janine L. Scancarelli

Laura E. Miller
(Durie Tangri LLP)

Steven D. Allison
(Troutman, Pepper, Hamilton & Sanders LLP)

Ari N. Rothman
(Venable LLP)

Alan D. Sege
(Sege Law Practice)

Annette M. McGarry

Joel D. Smith
(Bursor & Fisher PA)

Brett A. Garner

Michael H. Page
(Durie Tangri LLP)

Molly T. Cusson

Melissa C.R. McLaughlin


Facts

Edward Fields filed a class action against Wise Media LLC, Mobile Messenger Americas Inc., mBlox Inc., and Motricity Inc. for engaging in a scam known as "cramming" in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Plaintiffs sought to certify two classes and one subclass.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that the defendants enrolled consumers in short message service (SMS) text subscription plans without their knowledge or consent. The subscription came with monthly membership fees of $9.99, and provided consumers with trivia or horoscope information. Plaintiffs contended that Federal Trade Commission condemned the practice, which also known as "cramming."

In addition to involuntarily enrolling plaintiffs to one of the subscription plans, defendants also sent plaintiffs numerous unsolicited messages.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that plaintiffs voluntarily subscribed to receive the SMS text messages. Plaintiffs did so by entering their information into Wise Media's websites.

Result

U.S. District Judge William Alsup denied plaintiffs' motion for class certification for failing to show predominance of common issues with regard to the proposed nationwide classes and failing to show numerosity with regard to the proposed California subclass.


#111910

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390