This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
42 U.S.C. Section 1983
First and Fourteenth Amendments

Sami Ammari v. City of Los Angeles

Published: Aug. 2, 2014 | Result Date: Dec. 20, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:12-cv-04644-ODW-MRW Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

George M. Wallace
(Wallace Brown & Schwartz)


Defendant

Kimberly A. Erickson
(Office of the City Attorney)


Facts

Sami Ammari sued the City of Los Angeles, challenging a new law that regulated mobile billboard advertising displays.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Ammari claimed that he owned various lawful businesses within the City and County of Los Angeles, and that he advertised his products and services to the public by affixing signs to vans and other motorized vehicles that he then parked alongside streets within the city, where parking of motor vehicles was permitted. Ammari claimed that a new law amended Vehicle Code Section 21100, which prohibited mobile advertising billboard displays. Ammari contended that violation of the law could result in a citation or removal of the vehicle, as well as the imposition of civil and criminal penalties on the vehicle owner. As such, Ammari alleged violation of due process, free speech, privileges or immunities, California state due process, free speech claims, and California state privileges or immunities.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant moved for summary judgment.

Damages

Ammari sought an unspecified amount for compensatory damages as well as punitive damages, attorney fees and costs, and other relief.

Result

The court granted the city's motion for summary judgment, and entered judgment in favor of the city.

Other Information

FILING DATE: May 29, 2012.


#111976

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390