Nancy Bryant v. Chun K. Kim, DDS
Published: May 23, 2015 | Result Date: Apr. 27, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: INC 1106045 Verdict – Defense
Court
Riverside Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Greg W. Garrotto
(Law Offices of Greg W. Garrotto)
Defendant
Thomas G. Wianecki
(Wesierski & Zurek LLP)
Experts
Plaintiff
Richard A. Bullock
(medical)
Defendant
Barton A. Kubelka
(medical)
Facts
Plaintiff Nancy Bryant had a longstanding snoring problem. She came to defendant Dr. Chun K. Kim, DDS, who specializes in Dental Sleep Medicine, for an oral appliance to alter her airway, hoping this oral appliance would lessen or eliminate the snoring disorder. After delivery of the oral appliance, a temporomandibular joint, or TMJ, examination was performed. TMJ treatment was recommended and undertaken in two phases, splint therapy and composite buildups.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that no TMJ condition ever existed, and that the treatment was unnecessary. Plaintiff also claimed intentional concealment and fraud.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant claimed that the treatment was warranted and successful. Defendant contended that informed consent was obtained, and that the standard of care was met for both and the oral appliance and TMJ treatment. Defendant also claimed that the one-year statute of limitations expired on Oct. 23, 2009.
Injuries
Plaintiff alleged needing a full mouth reconstruction at a costs of $80,000. The defense disputed this and claimed that composites could have been removed at a minimal expense with little loss of existing tooth structure.
Result
Defense verdict.
Other Information
The case was bifurcated on the one-year statute of limitations. FILING DATE: July 26, 2011.
Deliberation
one hour
Poll
10-2 (for Oct. 23, 2008 as the beginning of the Statute of Limitations date), 12-0 (no intentional concealment), 12-0 (fraud)
Length
three days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390