This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
False Designation of Origin

Cloud B Inc. v. Glopo Inc., individually and dba Glopousa.com, Toybeyond.com, Little Genius and The Wonderland; Yilun Zhou, individually and dba Ellen Zhou, Ellen Truman, Ellen Clark, Glopo Inc., Glopousa.com, Toybeyond.com, Little Genius and The Wonderland, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Jun. 13, 2015 | Result Date: Apr. 6, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:14-cv-00896-BRO-RZ Settlement –  Permanent Injunction

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kelly W. Cunningham
(Cislo & Thomas LLP)

Daniel M. Cislo
(Cislo & Thomas LLP)


Defendant

Kevin P. O'Brien

George Leung-Chu Young
(Law Office of George L. Young)

Curtis R. Tingley

Stephen D. Collins

Steven L. Sugars

Kevin W. Isaacson


Facts

Cloud B Inc. filed an infringement lawsuit against Glopo Inc. and Yilun Zhou.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff designed, sold, and marketed the Cloud B, Twilight Ladybug, Twilight Turtle, and Twilight Sea Turtle marked toys and owned the trademarks, patents, and copyrights associated with them. Plaintiff alleged that defendants sold toys in connection with one of its trademarks, including copies of guidebooks, storybooks, and designs covered by one or more of plaintiffs' copyrights and toys covered by plaintiff's patents. As such, plaintiff sued defendant asserting causes of action for trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin, trade dress infringement, copyright infringement, unfair competition, state unfair competition, state trademark infringement, tortious interference with economic relationships, and patent infringement.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied the allegations and asserted a number of affirmative defenses.

Result

Ultimately, the parties entered a consent judgment permanently enjoining defendants from any further infringement.


#112203

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390