This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Fraud
Negligent Misrepresentation

Joel Klutch v. Scott Kinney aka Karim Akil, Amy Schloemann aka Amy Kinney, Gregory Orr, Wonda Kidd, HiddenBrooke Mortgage & Realty Inc., GLO Enterprise, Financial Title Company and Does 1 through 50

Published: Aug. 7, 2010 | Result Date: May 24, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: RG07318277 Bench Decision –  $686,022

Court

Alameda Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Louis S. Abronson
(Abronson Law Offices)


Defendant

Mark D. Epstein

Lee P. Bardellini


Facts

In 2005, plaintiff Joel Klutch purchased a house in Oakland for $615,000, with a brokerage fee of $16,760. Klutch contended that he made the purchase based on the assurances of defendants Scott and Amy Kinney, for whom he had been working as a notary, that the price was fair.

After discovering that the price was allegedly inflated and that the Kinneys benefited from his purchase, Klutch filed suit against the Kinneys, HiddenBrooke Mortgage & Realty Inc, GLO Enterprise, Gregory Orr, and Wanda Kidd for fraud.

Kidd and Financial Title settled out of the case for $5,000.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Klutch claimed the actual value of the property was $455,000, with $160,000, the amount inflated, going to GLO. Had Klutch known of the actual value, he claimed he wouldn't have consummated the purchase. Klutch claimed Kidd, an employee of Financial Title Co., prepared closing statements to conceal the difference in price from him.

Klutch claimed Scott assured him his monthly payment would not increase, but if it did, Scott would supply Klutch with funds for the difference for one year. Klutch contended that he received $46,000 in assistance from Scott for nine or 10 months, but not for the entire 12-month period, as per an agreement.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Orr and GLO denied and wrongdoing. The defense contended, and Klutch admitted in deposition, that Klutch had, in his role as a notary, been complicit in several previous fraudulent schemes with the Kinneys.

Damages

Klutch sought $114,000 in recovery, the actual purchase price of the property that was inflated less the advance he was given. He also sought punitive damages and costs.

Result

The court found that the Kinneys, Orr, GLO, and HiddenBrooke committed fraud and found them jointly and severally liable for $114,000 in compensatory damages, $70,836 in prejudgment interest, $1,186 in costs, and $500,000 in punitive damages. The total amount awarded was $686,022.


#112733

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390