This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Water Rights
Irrigation

Truckee Carson Irrigation District v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, Truckee-Meadows Water Authority

Published: Aug. 14, 2010 | Result Date: Jul. 15, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: T06/2239C Bench Decision –  Declaratory Relief

Court

Nevada Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Neil R. Bardack

Michael J. Van Zandt

Sophia B. Belloli


Defendant

Janine C. Prupas

Eric L. Garner
(Best Best & Krieger LLP)

Stefanie Hedlund

Jeffrey V. Dunn
(Best, Best & Krieger LLP)

William E. Peterson


Facts

Donner Lake is located on the California-Nevada border between Truckee Meadows Water Authority (Water Authority), which serves Reno, Sparks and other areas, and Truckee-Carson Irrigation District (Irrigation District), which serves agricultural interests in Fallon and Fernley, Nevada. The Water Authority stored its share of Donner Lake water in Boca Reservoir, which prevents flooding at Donner Lake. In 1943, the Water Authority's predecessor, Sierra Pacific Power Company, entered into an operating agreement with the Irrigation District regarding dam operations at Donner Lake.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The Water Authority filed suit against the Irrigation District, alleging it had a right to 50 percent of the 6,285 acre feet of water released from Donor Lake weekly.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The Irrigation District contended it was entitled to 100 percent of the water, dependent on circumstances and time of year, and that the Water Authority only had a right to use the water for non-consumptive uses.

Result

The court found that both parties had 50 percent of the water rights and that the Water Authority, as co-tenant, had a right to partition the stored water.


#112748

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390