ZL Technologies Inc. v. Gartner Group Inc., Carolyn DiCenzo
Published: Aug. 7, 2010 | Result Date: May 3, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 5:09-CV-02393-RS Bench Decision – Dismissal
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
James M. Wagstaffe
(Adamski Moroski Madden Cumberland & Green LLP)
Defendant
Robert P. Feldman
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Facts
ZL Technologies, a producer of e-mail archiving software, filed a defamation suit against defendant Gartner Inc., a technology research and advisory company, for ranking ZL as a "niche player" in Gartner's "Magic Quadrant" report.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
ZL claimed that the report constituted defamation, trade libel, and related torts. ZL contended that Gartner's ranking lacked a factual basis and was influenced by Gartner's biased preference for larger, more established companies. Moreover, ZL claimed that the rankings were not presented as subjective because they were supposedly arrived at by mathematical calculations, thereby being presented as statements of fact.
Damages
ZL sought $130 million in compensatory damages, $1.3 billion in punitive damages, and an injunction requiring the cessation of disparaging remarks toward ZL.
Result
The court dismissed ZL's claims, finding that Magic Quadrant was entitled to First Amendment protection as subjective views and opinions.
Other Information
FILING DATE: May 29, 2009.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390