This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Timothy Forsyth, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, v. Motion Picture Association of America v. Motion Picture Association of America Inc., The Walt Disney Company, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios LLC, Warner Bros.

Published: Jan. 14, 2017 | Result Date: Nov. 10, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:16-cv-00935-RS Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Sarah R. Holloway

David Schachman

Jeffrey F. Keller
(Keller Grover LLP)

John G. Jacobs

Bryan G. Kolton

Carey G. Been
(Keller Grover LLP)


Defendant

Glenn D. Pomerantz
(Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP)

Kelly M. Klaus
(Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP)

Adam I. Kaplan

K. Lee Marshall
(Bryan, Cave, Leighton & Paisner)

Alexandra C. Whitworth
(Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP)

Achyut J. Phadke
(Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP)

J. Roger Myers


Facts

Timothy Forsyth filed a putative class action against the Motion Picture Association of America Inc., its member studios, and the National Association of Theatre Owners, concerning the assignment of movie ratings for movies with any tobacco imagery.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that there was a correlation, even a causal relationship, between children's exposure to tobacco images in movies and increased levels of tobacco use and addiction. Plaintiff sought a legal determination that movies depicting any tobacco use must be assigned no lower than an "R" rating, subject to very narrow exceptions. Doing so, plaintiff contended, would prevent millions in premature deaths.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants filed an anti-SLAPP motion or, alternatively, moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim for relief.

Result

The court granted defendant's special motion to strike and motion to dismiss, holding that plaintiff's claim was subject to the anti-SLAPP statute, had no reasonable probability of succeeding, and alternatively, that the complaint failed to state a claim for relief.


#113247

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390