Paul Lewis v. Electrolink Engineering Services Inc.
Published: Feb. 25, 2017 | Result Date: Oct. 25, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: HG15787220 Verdict – Defense
Court
Alameda Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Mark B. O'Connor
(Shea & Shea)
Michael M. Shea
(Shea & Shea)
Defendant
Daniel R. Friedenthal
(Friedenthal, Heffernan & Brown LLP)
Elaine Tanudjaja
(Bledsoe Diestel Treppa & Crane LLP)
Richard S. Diestel
(Bledsoe, Diestel, Treppa & Crane LLP)
Experts
Plaintiff
John Palmer
(technical)
Facts
On Nov. 30, 2014, plaintiff Paul Lewis, an employee of Tesla Motors in Fremont, reached into a 12 kV cabinet that had been re-energized earlier in the day. Defendant Electrolink Engineering Services Inc., a substation of Tesla, was performing preventive maintenance at the time. Plaintiff was electrocuted when an arc explosion occurred.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that defendant did not warn plaintiff that the 12 kV cabinet unit was re-energized.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant claimed that it did not control plaintiff, and that plaintiff had notice of the 12 kV cabinet not being energized and failed to use due care.
Settlement Discussions
A mediation took place on Aug. 23, 2016, with Justice Edward Panelli. Plaintiff demanded $2 million. Defendant offered $25,000 at mediation.
Injuries
Plaintiff suffered thermal burns over his body, traumatic brain injury, had a shoulder and neck surgery and claimed residual problems.
Result
Defense as to Electrolink Engineering Services Inc.
Other Information
This case was a bifurcated trial. FILING DATE: Sept. 25, 2015.
Deliberation
three hours
Poll
10-2 (no liability on Electrolink Engineering Services)
Length
eight days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390