This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Bicycle
Failure to Yield

Marcela Mendonza v. Joseph Flores Beauchamp, Ronald Patterson, and Does 1 to 50

Published: Feb. 11, 2017 | Result Date: Oct. 13, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC575100 Verdict –  $125,000

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stephen K. McElroy
(Carpenter, Zuckerman & Rowley LLP)


Defendant

Deborah S. Tropp
(McNeil, Tropp & Braun LLP)


Facts

Marcela Mendoza sued Joseph Beauchamp and Ronald Patterson in connection with a collision between a motor vehicle and a bicyclist that allegedly occurred on May 15, 2013.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff was riding her bicycle along N. Palm Dr. in Beverly Hills. She stopped at a stop sign at Burton Way and, as she proceeded to cross the street, she was struck by defendant's vehicle. Plaintiff was thrown over the vehicle and landed on Beauchamp's trunk. Plaintiff was injured as a result and sued Beauchamp for negligence and the prior owner of the vehicle he was driving for vicarious liability. Defendant was allegedly driving without his lights on in the dark. Plaintiff contended that defendant should have seen her riding her bicycle, which had its lights on, but that defendant was not paying attention to his driving.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended that it was still light out when the incident occurred and, as such, he need not turn on his lights. Defendant blamed the whole incident on defendant, asserting that she should have seen him. Defendant also disputed the extent of plaintiff's claimed injuries, contending they were only minor.

Settlement Discussions

Mendoza demanded $125,000 in settlement, which Beauchamp countered with a $40,000 offer of settlement.

Damages

Mendoza claimed she would need future scar revision surgery and surgical hardware removal.

Injuries

Mendoza fractured various bones on her foot. She also sustained a hematoma and lipoma on her right thigh. She underwent surgery to repair the fractures and another surgery to remove a lipoma. Moreover, she was left with permanent scarring and disfigurement.

Result

Patterson was ultimately let out of the case and the matter proceeded against Beauchamp only. Ultimately, the jury found Mendoza 55 percent liable and Beauchamp 45 percent liable. It determined Mendoza's damages totaled $125,000, consisting of $45,000 in past economic damages, $10,000 in future economic damages, $50,000 in past noneconomic damages, and $20,000 in future noneconomic damages. After the offset, Mendoza was set to recover $56,250 from Beauchamp.

Other Information

FILING DATE: March 11, 2015.


#113313

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390