The Inland Oversight Committee, and Does 1 through 10 v. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (US), LLP; Squire, Sanders (US) LLP; Squire, Patton, Boggs (US) LLP; and Does 11 through 1,000
Published: Feb. 18, 2017 | Result Date: Jan. 17, 2017 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: BC637093 Bench Decision – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Anthony N. Kim
(Briggs Law Corporation)
Cory J. Briggs
(Briggs Law Corp.)
Defendant
James P. Fogelman
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher)
Shannon E. Mader
(Gibson Dunn & Crutcher)
Facts
The Inland Oversight Committee sued Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (US) LLP, Squire, Sanders (US) LLP, and Squire, Patton, Boggs (US) LLP, in connection with agreements to provide certain legal services to the City of West Covina.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff was a non-profit advocacy organization. Plaintiff alleged causes of action for restitution, constructive trust, and declaratory and injunctive relief solely for the benefit of the City of West Covina and its taxpayers. Defendants allegedly entered into agreements to provide certain legal services to the city. Plaintiff filed this lawsuit seeking to recover monies paid to defendants under those agreements under the theory of taxpayer waste. Plaintiff contended that the agreements were unauthorized because they were signed by the city manager, and not the city attorney as required under the law.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants demurred on grounds of statute of limitations and lack of standing.
Result
The court sustained the demurrer.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390