This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Richard G. Heller, as trustee for The Heller Trust v. American States Insurance Company, Maryann Mull, and Does 1 through 20, inclusive

Published: Mar. 4, 2017 | Result Date: Jan. 9, 2017 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:15-cv-09771-DMG-JPR Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Boris Treyzon
(Abir, Cohen, Treyzon & Salo LLP)

Monica A. Szkopek

Renata R. Salo
(Abir, Cohen, Treyzon & Salo LLP)


Defendant

Beth E. Yoffie

Susan K. Sullivan
(Clyde & Co US LLP)

Patricia A. Daza-Luu


Facts

Richard Heller, as trustee for The Heller Trust, sued American States Insurance Co. (ASIC) and Maryann Mull, involving a contractual dispute.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff owned rental properties insured by defendant ASI under a commercial insurance policy. On May 23, 2012, plaintiff sustained damages due to fire and filed a claim with ASIC. ASIC retained Mull, a consultant, to determine plaintiff's loss. Mull, however, ignored and continued to ignore data plaintiff had provided. Consequently, ASIC denied plaintiff's claim, prompting this lawsuit. Plaintiff alleged causes of action for breach of contract; breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and violation of Business & Professions Code Section 17200 et seq.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
ASIC moved for summary judgment, arguing, among other things, that it had no duty to pay further loss of rent to plaintiff because plaintiff failed to demonstrate actual loss of rent above those already paid by ASIC and another insurer. ASIC also contended that plaintiff's extra expense benefits were not covered under the policy. It also denied plaintiff's bad faith claim.

Result

Ultimately, the court granted summary judgment in ASIC's favor in its entirety.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Dec. 18, 2015.


#113398

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390