This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Race Discrimination
Fair Housing Act

Carmen Cortes v. County of Santa Clara

Published: May 6, 2017 | Result Date: Oct. 5, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:11-cv-03645-EJD Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dow W. Patten
(Smith Patten)


Defendant

David M. Rollo
(Office of the Santa Clara County Counsel)


Facts

Carmen Cortes sued the County of Santa Clara in connection with her allegedly wrongful termination.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff worked for the county as an auditor-appraiser. She had sensitivities to odors in the office and suffered from allergies, which affected her job performance. She requested accommodation, but was, instead disciplined and subjected to adverse employment actions such as suspensions in 2009 and 2010. Eventually, the county fired her for allegedly failing to meet performance quotas that other non-Hispanic workers were not required to meet.

Plaintiff sued the county, alleging wrongful termination in violation of the FEHA as well as causes of action for age discrimination, disability discrimination, retaliation, and failure to engage in the interactive process. Plaintiff contended that her alleged failure to meet the made-up quotas was pre-textual.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff was allegedly fired for consistently failing to meet work expectations.

Injuries

Cortes suffered from emotional distress.

Result

Several of Cortes' claims were eventually dropped and, in 2013, the district court entered judgment in favor of the county. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit revived her discrimination claim. Ultimately, the jury rejected her arguments and rendered a defense verdict.


#113440

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390