This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Non-Vehicular)
Construction Accident
Negligence

Adams & Brown v. PLH Investors, et al.

Published: Sep. 7, 1996 | Result Date: Aug. 23, 1996 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SCV207591 –  $1,000,000

Judge

C. Kenneth James

C. Kenneth James

Court

Sonoma Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Patrick W. Emery

Jeffrey Steinberg

Patrick W. Emery

Jeffrey Steinberg


Defendant

Steven M. Marden

Thomas M. Downey
(Burnham Brown)

Steven M. Marden

Thomas M. Downey
(Burnham Brown)


Experts

Plaintiff

Ken Todd
(technical)

Jerry L. Hildreth
(technical)

Ken Todd
(technical)

Jerry L. Hildreth
(technical)

Defendant

Steven R. Fisk
(technical)

Wes Daniels
(technical)

Steven R. Fisk
(technical)

Wes Daniels
(technical)

Facts

On May 13, 1993, plaintiff Dan Adams, a 31-year-old carpenter and plaintiff Warren Brown, a 40-year-old carpenter, were seriously injured when a large wood-framed wall fell on them during the course of their employment as carpenters with Hageman Framing. Hageman Framing was framing semi-custom homes in a residential subdivision in Santa Rosa. The wall was nearly twenty feet high and weighed approximately one ton. The wall was being raised manually from a horizontal to a vertical position by seven people under the direction of Charles Hageman, the owner of Hageman Framing. These individuals were unable to lift the wall into position, and it crashed back toward them, striking and seriously injuring both plaintiffs. The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendants, PLH Investors -- the subdivision's owner and developer and Patrick Lockwood -- the general contractor and a PLH partner, based on negligence and respondeat superior theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand for the $1 million policy limits. The defendants made a settlement offer of $150,000 at the court ordered settlement conference.

Specials in Evidence

$__________ (plaintiff Adams); $_________ (plaintiff Woods) $__________ (plaintiff Adams); $_________ (plaintiff Woods) $__________ (plaintiff Adams); $_________ (plaintiff Woods) $__________ (plaintiff Adams); $_________ (plaintiff Woods)

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately two years and four months after the case was filed. The plaintiffs claimed the jury returned a verdict in their favor on all theories. Prior to trial, the parties stipulated that should the jury allocate 50% or more of the total fault for the accident to any insured defendant, the entire $1 million policy limit would be paid to the plaintiffs. The insured defendants included PLH Investors, all individual members of that partnership and Patrick Lockwood acting in his capacity as general contractor. Pursuant to that stipulation, only the liability issues were tried.

Deliberation

8 hours

Length

5 days


#113971

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390