This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Breach of Implied Contract

Michael O'Connor v. Exchange Bank

Published: Apr. 18, 1998 | Result Date: Mar. 25, 1998 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 204252 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Thomas A. Campbell

Court

Sonoma Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John J. Mavredakis


Defendant

Lewis R. Warren
(Abbey Weitzenberg Warren & Emery)


Experts

Plaintiff

Mark R. Newton
(technical)

Defendant

Jack Thomas
(technical)

Barry Ben-Zion Ph.D.
(technical)

James C. McGowan
(technical)

Craig Pratt
(technical)

Facts

Defendant Exchange Bank employed plaintiff Michael O'Connor for 16 years, approximately five years as branch manager. During the plaintiff's last year of employment there were a number of issues raised regarding unsatisfactory performance. The final incident, just prior to termination, involved the plaintiff's reaction to, and handling of, a fraud scheme to which his branch fell victim. The plaintiff was terminated on July 13, 1992, and brought this action against the defendant based on a breach of implied contract theory of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a C.C.P. º998 settlement demand for $200,000. The defendant made a C.C.P. º998 offer of compromise for $50,000.

Damages

Plaintiff claimed economic damages totaling $431,000.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately five years after the case was filed. The jury agreed that an implied contract existed with respect to the plaintiff's termination. However, the jury found that the bank did have good cause to terminate the plaintiff's employment, and that it did not violate any covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

Deliberation

two hours

Poll

11-1 (for plaintiff - existence of implied contract), 10-2 (for defendant - breach without cause), 9-3 (for defendant - breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing)

Length

eight days


#114029

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390