This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Failure to Pay
Defective Product

Attorney Recovery Systems, Inc., assignee of Best Label Company, Inc. v. Paper N, a California Corporation dba Paper N, Inc., et al.

Published: Nov. 11, 2006 | Result Date: Sep. 6, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CLJ 448801 Verdict –  $22,555 (including $18,746.55 principal damages, $1,858.73 pre-judgment interest, $1,000 attorney's fees per Civil Code 1717.5 and $949.20 in recoverable court costs and expenses)

Court

San Mateo Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kurt A. Miller

Joseph P. Graziano


Defendant

K. Keith McAllister


Facts

Defendant, Paper N, ordered 45,000 bumper stickers for one of its customers from Best Label Co. via a written purchase order. Best Label delivered the stickers directly to defendant's customer and sent defendant an invoice for $26,746.55. Defendant made payments of $6,000 and $2,000, leaving a principal balance due of $18,746.55. When defendant refused to pay the balance due, Best Label assigned its claims against defendant to plaintiff, Attorney Recovery Systems, Inc., a collection agency, which filed suit against defendant.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that defendant had accepted the bumper stickers and was obligated to pay for them in full. It emphasized that the defendant's customer never complained about the stickers, had fully paid defendant for the stickers, and had continued business with defendant. Neither defendant nor its customer returned the stickers. Plaintiff also contended that defendant's making of two partial payments was inconsistent with defendant's claim that the stickers were defective. Finally, plaintiff argued that defendant presented no admissible evidence to support its claim of lost business.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended that the bumper stickers were not within industry standards, not produced as specified in defendant's purchase order, and not timely delivered. Defendant therefore claimed the loss of future business totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars. Defendant further contended that as a result of the inferior goods, defendant was "black balled" in the industry.

Settlement Discussions

Less than a week before trial, defendant offered to pay the principal balance of $18,746.55 over the course of 23 months.

Result

The jury awarded plaintiff $18,746.55 in principal damages, $1,858.73 in pre-judgment interest, $1,000 in attorney fees, and $949.20 in recoverable court costs and expenses, for a total of $22,554.48.


#114408

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390