This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract

Don McCasland v. Chemicon International

Published: Dec. 16, 2006 | Result Date: May 15, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: RIC393105 Bench Verdict –  $9,800,000 (total)

Court

Riverside Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mitchell S. Wagner

Anthony B. Getchell


Defendant

Ronald D. Getchey

Christian D. Humphreys
(Dentons US LLP)

Russell A. Gold
(Fox Law APC)


Facts

Plaintiffs Don McCasland and Dale Dembrow were hired by the founder of defendant Chemicon International. In order to keep plaintiffs with the company, defendant signed plaintiffs to Buy/Sell Bonus Agreements whereby defendant promised plaintiffs percentages of the net sale price of the company if plaintiffs continued working for defendant. Defendant was sold to Serologicals Corporation in April 2003. Defendant refused to pay the bonuses or tell plaintiffs the sale price, contending that bonuses were not due.

Contentions

CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs sued defendant for breach of contract. Defendant asserted that $16 million in debt and $19 million of the purchase price held in escrow to protect Serologicals against potential liabilities should be deducted in establishing the net sales price on which the bonuses were based.

Damages

Plaintiffs claimed damages of $8 to 9 million plus statutory interest accrued since the bonuses were due. Plaintiffs also sought attorney fees.

Result

Just before trial, defendant paid $4.2 million based on a net sale price with a deduction of the $16 million in debt and $19 million held in escrow. The court found that plaintiffs were owed bonuses under the agreements, and that the debt and held escrow amounts were not deductible in determining the net sale price as defined in the agreements. The court determined the founder of defendant induced the company not to pay the bonuses but did not impose liability based on alter ego or intentional interference with contract. The court concluded that no injustice would result from the failure to impose alter ego liability. It also concluded that the founder was not a stranger to the contract so as to permit a finding of third-party interference. The award to plaintiffs was $5.6 million in addition to the $4.2 million Chemicon paid just before trial. In addition, the court award plaintiffs attorney fees.

Length

one month


#114440

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390