This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Air Pollution
Best Available Retrofit Technology

Dine Care and National Parks Conservation Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa P. Jackson

Published: Dec. 14, 2013 | Result Date: Dec. 3, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:12-cv-03987-JSW Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Facts

Dine Care and the National Parks Conservation Association filed a citizen's suit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, claiming that the EPA had unreasonably delayed in promulgating a final rule establishing Best Available Retrofit Technology for the Navajo Generation Station. Navajo Generation Station was a power plant located on the Navajo National Indian Reservation in northern Arizona.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs argued that pollution from Navajo Generation Station had plagued the Grand Canyon and other areas, discharging a great deal of pollutants into the air of the American Southwest. They further claimed that this pollution caused a visibility impairment that the EPA had a duty to resolve. The EPA was informed that it needed to conduct a regional Best Available Retrofit Technology analysis, but did not do so. Plaintiffs then sought a court order that the EPA had failed to make a Best Available Retrofit Technology determination for the Navajo Generation Station, which constituted a failure to perform a nondiscretionary duty without unreasonable delay.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The EPA moved for summary judgment, arguing that this court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear this particular case.

Result

The court granted the EPA's motion for summary judgment, and dismissed this case.


#114741

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390