This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Contracts
Electric Power Sales, California Energy Crisis

People of the State of California ex rel. Edmud G. Brown Jr. and the California Dept. of Water Resources by and through its California Energy Resources Scheduling Division v. United States

Published: Jan. 4, 2014 | Result Date: Apr. 2, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 07-184C Bench Decision –  Overcharge Refunds

Court

U.S. Court of Federal Claims


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Marie L. Fiala
(Law Office of Andrei D. Popovici, PC)

Gary Alexander

Jane I. Ryan

Mark Fogelman


Defendant

Timothy P. McIlmail

Jeanne E. Davidson

Martin F. Hockey

Stuart F. Delery


Facts

The Bonneville Power Administration and Western Area Power Administration participated in the California Power Exchange and California Independent System Corporation. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulated electric energy markets. FERC put the sellers on notice that if they investigated and found that any prices charged were unjust and unreasonable, the sellers would be liable to give refunds. The FERC eventually found prices to be unfair and reset them.

The State of California later brought suit against the federal government, seeking a determination of whether it was contractually bound to retain the just and reasonable prices set by the FERC. They also sought refunds of the any prices charged that exceeded the mitigated prices.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs moved for declaratory judgment, arguing that the Bonneville Power Administration and Western Area Power Administration had breached their contractual obligations by not providing refunds for overcharges.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued that plaintiffs' claims were precluded and moot, based on a prior decision in City of Redding v. FERC, 693 F.3d 828 (9th Cir. Aug. 27, 2012).

Result

The court granted plaintiffs' request for declaratory judgment.


#114785

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390