People of the State of California ex rel. Edmud G. Brown Jr. and the California Dept. of Water Resources by and through its California Energy Resources Scheduling Division v. United States
Published: Jan. 4, 2014 | Result Date: Apr. 2, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 07-184C Bench Decision – Overcharge Refunds
Court
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Marie L. Fiala
(Law Office of Andrei D. Popovici, PC)
Defendant
Facts
The Bonneville Power Administration and Western Area Power Administration participated in the California Power Exchange and California Independent System Corporation. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulated electric energy markets. FERC put the sellers on notice that if they investigated and found that any prices charged were unjust and unreasonable, the sellers would be liable to give refunds. The FERC eventually found prices to be unfair and reset them.
The State of California later brought suit against the federal government, seeking a determination of whether it was contractually bound to retain the just and reasonable prices set by the FERC. They also sought refunds of the any prices charged that exceeded the mitigated prices.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs moved for declaratory judgment, arguing that the Bonneville Power Administration and Western Area Power Administration had breached their contractual obligations by not providing refunds for overcharges.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued that plaintiffs' claims were precluded and moot, based on a prior decision in City of Redding v. FERC, 693 F.3d 828 (9th Cir. Aug. 27, 2012).
Result
The court granted plaintiffs' request for declaratory judgment.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390