This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Police Negligence
False Arrest

Robert Duncan, Janet Duncan and Christopher Duncan, a minor, by through his Guardian ad Litem, Robert Duncan v. County of Sacramento, Steve lee

Published: Jan. 31, 2009 | Result Date: Aug. 26, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:06-CV-00647 GEB BAD Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Johnny L. Griffin III
(Law Office of Johnny L. Griffin III)

Manolo H. Olaso
(Law Office of Johnny L. Griffin III)


Defendant

Thomas A. Cregger
(Cregger & Chalfant LLP)


Facts

On Aug. 31, 2005, Robert Duncan, Janet Duncan, and their son, Christopher Duncan, age 17, were driving back to their Elk Grove home when they saw defendant Steven Lee, an employee of defendant Sacramento County District Attorney's Office Board of Investigations. The Duncans gave chase in their vehicle and were pursued by Lee and the California Highway Patrol (CHP). The Duncans were eventually stopped after exiting the freeway and ordered out of their vehicle. The CHP were mistakenly informed that a suspect was in the Duncans' vehicle but Lee was merely there to serve Christopher Duncan a subpoena, as he was a witness to an assault. Lee arrived on the scene shortly thereafter and the Duncans were released after the situation was explained to CHP.

The Duncans filed suit for civil rights violations.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The Duncans contended that their civil rights were violated by the chase as they were not sure who Lee was as he did not identify himself.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants contended that Lee was lawfully serving a subpoena and that due to an honest misunderstanding by dispatch, CHP was mistakenly told that the Duncans' vehicle contained a suspect instead of a witness.

Injuries

The Duncans suffered injuries including emotional distress.

Result

The jury found for the defendants.

Deliberation

2.5 hours

Poll

8-0

Length

three days


#115168

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390