Joseph Snead v. Chino Valley Unified School District
Published: Jul. 3, 2015 | Result Date: Jun. 17, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: CIVRS1101184 Verdict – $550,000
Court
San Bernardino Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Tamara S. Freeze
(Workplace Justice Advocates PLC)
Robert A. Odell
(Workplace Justice Advocates PLC)
Defendant
Michael J. Marlatt
(Thompson & Colegate LLP)
Facts
Plaintiff Joseph Snead worked as a custodian for Chino Valley Unified School District for 16 years at an elementary school. In 2010, he sustained a back injury, which prevented him from working on ladders.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that the use of ladders was very rare and even then, he could have done his work with accommodations, using extension poles, change of schedules and reassignment of duties. Plaintiff also claimed that his proposed accommodations would not have caused undue burden on the district.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The school district claimed that the use of ladders was an essential function of the job of all custodians and terminated plaintiff. The district also claimed that plaintiff's proposed accommodations would have created an undue burden on the district.
Settlement Discussions
The school district made a $20,000 pretrial offer. According to defense, the school district would have gone higher but there were no further settlement discussions.
Result
Verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $550,000, on all causes of action for disability discrimination, failure to accommodate and failure to engage in an interactive process.
Other Information
According to defense, the initial jury poll was 8-4 defense, but then after further deliberations 9-3 plaintiff. FILING DATE: Feb. 2, 2011.
Deliberation
one day
Poll
9-3 on all causes of action/damages
Length
10 days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390