This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Landlord/Tenant
Wrongful Eviction
Cross-Complaint

Keith Pride; Loretta Morgan v. Eunice Booker, and cross-complaint: Eunice Booker v. Keith Pride; Loretta Morgan

Published: Sep. 27, 1997 | Result Date: Aug. 14, 1997 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 975928 Verdict –  $15,750

Judge

William J. Harris

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

J. Scott Weaver


Defendant

L. Jay Pedersen


Facts

Plaintiffs Keith Pride and Lorreta Morgan lived in defendant Eunice Booker's building at 591-93 Waller from March 1994 through August 1995. The plaintiffs claimed they were forced to move because of harassment by the defendant. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant intended to cause them to vacate the premises by performing the following actions: entering frequently without notice, removing personal property, tearing down an interior wall in the unit, turning off the electricity and heat, discontinuing utilities and assaulting plaintiff Morgan's daughter. The defendant contended that the plaintiffs originally promised to occupy the premises for only three months, then refused to vacate for more than 18 months, and that on May 7, 1995, they threw dirty water on her. The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendant based on a wrongful eviction theory of recovery. The defendant filed cross-complaint for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs made a settlement demand for $40,000. The defendant made a C.C.P. º998 offer of compromise for $10,000.

Damages

The plaintiffs claimed $25,000 in damages. The cross-complainant claimed unspecxified damages.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and six months after the case was filed.

Deliberation

1 day

Poll

unanimous

Length

8 days


#115709

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390