California River Watch, et al. v. County of Sonoma
Published: Jan. 10, 2015 | Result Date: Jul. 10, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 3:14-cv-00217-WHA Bench Decision – Dismissal
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Jack Silver
(Law Office of Jack Silver)
Defendant
Paul P. Spaulding III
(Farella Braun + Martel LLP)
Facts
California River Watch sued the County of Sonoma for the alleged taking of California tiger salamanders.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that the county violated the federal Endangered Species Act by causing takes of the endangered California tiger salamander through the adverse modification of 47,383 acres of land designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as critical habitat on the Santa Rosa Plain. Plaintiff alleged that private agricultural, industrial, and residential projects caused take, and that the county was liable because it authorized these projects. Plaintiff also alleged that the county caused take of the endangered salamander directly through its own public projects.
Result
The court found that the action was abstract and not yet ripe for adjudication. It dismissed the complaint without prejudice to filing a new case addressing a specific project. The court also found that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit because the plaintiff's notice letters did not provide sufficient information of a violation so that the county could identify and attempt to abate it. The reference to 47,383 acres did not provide sufficient geographic information, and the notice letters were also inconsistent with the complaint. Notwithstanding, the county agreed to provide certain injunctive relief, including providing additional notice of all permits contemplating development within the designated California tiger salamander habitat area through maintenance of a publicly-accessible database.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390