This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Auto
Uninsured Motorist

Richard Norton v. Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance

Published: Oct. 8, 2005 | Result Date: Aug. 25, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: DUM0003021 Arbitration –  $633,381

Court

Case Not Filed


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Del D. Hovden


Defendant

Jeffrey H. Baraban
(Baraban & Teske)


Experts

Plaintiff

Peter Formuzis Ph.D.
(technical)

Gary Chang
(medical)

Gene Bruno M.S., C.R.C., C.C.M., C.D.M.S.
(technical)

Stuart M. Gold
(medical)

Defendant

Milton E. Legome M.D.
(medical)

Heidi Paul Ph.D.
(technical)

Facts

On June 9, 2000, Richard Norton, 53, was broadsided by another vehicle as he was driving through an intersection in Torrance. Norton, who suffered injuries, sued the driver of the other vehicle and settled with him for his $30,000 policy. Norton also sued Tokio Marine Insurance which was his own underinsured motorist carrier. The defense contended that the plaintiff would not require the kind of future surgeries he claimed would be necessary for his injuries. The defense argued that the plaintiff would be able to return to work and there would be no impact on his future earning capacity.

Specials in Evidence

The plaintiff requested $79,000

Injuries

Immediately following the accident, the plaintiff claimed he suffered from shoulder pain for which he underwent acromioclavicular joint surgery, as well as therapy. Thereafter, the plaintiff claimed neck pain and one year later, the plaintiff claimed knee pain and stiffness. The plaintiff underwent epidural injections for cervical radiculopathy and knee surgery. The plaintiff's physician testified that the plaintiff would require future cervical and knee surgeries. The plaintiff claimed that the extent of his injuries and medication (Neurontin) caused him to lose his ability to concentrate and led to the loss of his job as a supervisor for an automobile dealership.

Result

The arbitrator, Peter J. Searle of Judicate West, found in favor of the plaintiff. The defense claims the award will be reduced by $140,844 for benefits already paid, resulting in a net award to the plaintiff of $492,537.

Other Information

The arbitrator, Peter J. Searle of Judicate West, found in favor of the plaintiff. According to the defense, the award will be reduced by $140,844 for benefits already paid.


#117035

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390