This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Retaliation/Failure to Prevent Discrimination/Failure to Accommodate

Tania X. Garcia v. Electrical Industry Service Bureau Inc.

Published: Dec. 8, 2007 | Result Date: Oct. 31, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CGC 06-454840 Verdict –  $353,680

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Virginia R. Villegas
(The Villegas Law Firm APC)

Richard J. Vaznaugh
(Law Office of Richard J. Vaznaugh)

Marina J. Smerling


Defendant

William J. Flynn
(Neyhart, Anderson, Flynn & Grosboll)

Scott M. De Nardo


Experts

Plaintiff

Jan Duffy
(technical)

John Koo
(medical)

Defendant

Todd S. Anhalt
(medical)

Facts

Plaintiff Tania X. Garcia worked at the Electrical Industry Service Bureau, Inc. ("EISB") in San Francisco for four years as a data entry clerk. EISB is an administrator for employee benefit plans for union electricians in San Francisco. Garcia suffers from eczema, which she claimed caused her skin to crack and bleed. Her psychological social worker certified her as disabled to the State and notified the employer plaintiff was ill and unable to work. Garcia went on unpaid medical leave on Oct. 26, 2004. During the period of her leave, Garcia did not see a physician for her eczema.

On the 90th day of her leave, Jan. 24, 2005, EISB fired her by mail and shipped her belongings. The termination letter stated that her disability leave had exceeded 90 days, the permissible time allotted under the collective bargaining agreement. Ms. Garcia claimed she received no warning and that she made an effort to obtain reinstatement which was refused. Ms. Garcia's union refused to take her case to arbitration under the collective bargaining agreement citing the agreement provision as to leaves which were not to exceed 90 days.

Result

The jury unanimously found for plaintiff on disability discrimination, retaliation, failure to prevent discrimination, failure to accommodate and failure to engage in interactive process. The jury awarded Garcia $153,680 in past lost wages and benefits and economic damages and $200,000 in non-economic damages, totaling $353,680.

Poll

unanimous; 11-4 (amount of damages)


#117111

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390