This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Breach of Contract
ERISA

Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Health Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Joint Apprenticeship Training Funds, Fred Inman, Charles Del Monte and District Council 16 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades v. Christopher Lum Hyland, dba Chris Hyland dba Hyland-Tsukamoto Painting and Decorating

Published: Dec. 29, 2007 | Result Date: Oct. 9, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: C07-5065 JSW Bench Decision –  $55,242

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michele R. Stafford
(Saltzman & Johnson Law Corp.)

Muriel B. Kaplan


Facts

Plaintiff District Council 16 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, entered into a bargaining agreement with Christopher Lum Hyland, owner of Hyland-Tsukamoto Painting and Decorating in San Francisco.

District Council 16 alleged that under the agreement, Hyland was required to submit monthly reports of hours worked by its employees and regularly contribute to its ERISA funds. The agreement also required Hyman to pay interest on the combined contributions and liquidated damages at the rates set by the bargaining agreement.

The union contended that Hyland failed to report and pay the contributions to the ERISA funds for hours worked by its employees from June through August 2007, even after numerous demands. The union further alleged that Hyland failed to pay liquidated damages and interest owing for the period of February through March of 2007.

The plaintiffs brought suit for breach of contract and violation of ERISA.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that Hyland had a statutory and contractual duty to make the required timely payments to the ERISA funds, which it failed to do.

Damages

The plaintiff sought $55,000.

Result

The court entered a consent judgment awarding the plaintiffs $55,242.25, with Hyland to pay the plaintiffs $4,610 a month for 12 months through October 2008.


#117151

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390