This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Trip and Fall/Dangerous Condition of Public Property

Karina N. Gomez v. City of Hollister

Published: Dec. 29, 2007 | Result Date: Oct. 31, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CU-06-00131 Verdict –  Defense

Court

San Benito Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

William L. Marder
(Polaris Law Group LLP)


Defendant

Douglas F. Young


Experts

Plaintiff

Barry Tuch
(medical)

Defendant

Daniel S. Merrick
(technical)

Samuel M. Wayne
(medical)

Facts

Plaintiff, Karina N. Gomez, was walking with her husband down Hill Street in Hollister when she tripped and fell, breaking her ankle. Gomez sued defendant, the city of Hollister, alleging a dangerous condition of public property. Gomez claimed that she fell due to a deteriorated area of asphalt. She said she could not see the condition of the road because the street was unlit.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff alleged that the city was aware of the danger for years and was under the duty to correct it because of the presence of a public park and city offices on that street.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant argued that it knew of the condition of the street because it had an inspection and street survey program in effect, but did not agree that the condition was dangerous. Rather the condition was only a minor defect. The city also claimed that whether or not the condition was dangerous, the city's response was reasonable under Government Code Section 835(b)(1) and (2), given budget constraints. Only $4.5 million was available each year for street repairs, while more than $65 million in repairs were needed.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $235,000. The defendant offered $35,000.

Damages

Past and future pain and suffering as well as $44,000 in past medical expenses and $12,000 in past lost wages.

Injuries

The plaintiff suffered fracture of ankle; two surgeries, one for installation of metal plate and screws and the other for removal of some screws; 24 sessions of physical therapy; depression and frustration.

Result

The jury returned a defense verdict. Defense counsel reported that although the jurors interviewed were sympathetic to plaintiff's injuries, they believed the accident was Gomez's fault and that the defect was minor at most.

Deliberation

five minutes

Poll

12-0

Length

three days


#117211

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390