This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Failure to Hedge/Breach of Fiduciary Duty/Negligence/Negligent Supervision/Florida Securities and In

Geradons, S.L., Salvador Porte, Eduardo Kawas v. Goldman Sachs & Co.

Published: Jan. 5, 2008 | Result Date: Nov. 15, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 05-01724 Arbitration –  For respondent Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Court

Arbitration Forum


Attorneys

Claimant

Jan D. Atlas

Dale Ledbetter


Respondent

Jonathan DeGooyer

Michael J. Lawson

C. Evans Stewart
(Cohen & Gresser LLP)


Facts

On April 4, 2005, claimants Geradons S.L., Salvador Porte and Eduardo Kawas filed a statement of claim with the arbitration facilities of the National Association of Securities Dealers (now known as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or FINRA) in Boca Raton, Florida, alleging claims against Goldman, Sachs & Co. for negligence, negligent supervision, breach of fiduciary duty and violation of Chapter 517 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act.

Contentions

CLAIMANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Claimants alleged that: (1) Goldman Sachs failed complete a loan to claimants in a timely manner, using claimants' restricted shares of Starmedia, Inc. as collateral; (2) Goldman Sachs failed to "collar" claimants' restricted Starmedia stock; and, (3) Goldman Sachs failed to deliver claimants' restricted Starmedia stock to another brokerage house in a timely manner in January 2000.

RESPONDENTS' CONTENTIONS:
Goldman Sachs denied claimants' allegations in their entirety and asserted various affirmative defenses, including that each of claimants' claims was barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.

Damages

Claimants initially sought compensatory damages "in excess of $5 million," plus an unspecified amount of punitive damages, disgorgement of any and all improperly acquired fees, costs and attorneys' fees associated with the arbitration proceedings, and any further relief deemed just and proper by the arbitration panel. Claimants increased their prayer for compensatory damages to over $12 million during the evidentiary hearing held on Nov. 5-8, 2007 in Boca Raton, Florida. At the conclusion of claimants' case-in-chief, Goldman Sachs requested that claimants' statement of claim be dismissed in its entirety on the grounds that claimants' failed to meet their burden of proof for each cause of action and that each of claimants' claims was time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.

Result

The FINRA arbitration panel found in favor of Goldman Sachs, denying claimants' claims in their entirety.


#117287

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390