This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Strict Liability

Kimberly S. Hall v. Casa de Fruta Orchards Inc.

Published: Oct. 26, 2004 | Result Date: Apr. 7, 2004 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV0300020 Bench Decision –  $49,261

Judge

Alan H. Hedegard

Court

San Benito Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jason Scott Bell


Defendant

Karen E. Lintott


Experts

Plaintiff

Randi A. Galli M.D.
(medical)

Facts

In October 2002, Kimberly Hall and several friends visited a zoo on the premises of Casa de Fruta Orchards Inc. in Hollister. The zoo included an area where people could pet certain animals. Hall walked through an open gate and stood near a corral, which held four buffalo. The buffalo approached her. Hall reached through the corral fence to pet one of the buffalo's head, but it jerked its head and pinned her hand between its head and the metal fence.

Settlement Discussions

Hall made a C.C.P. Section 998 demand of $35,000. Casa de Fruta offered $3,000.

Damages

Hall sought past ($1,861) and future ($2,000) medical costs; and past ($5,400) and future ($40,000) pain and suffering.

Injuries

Hall claimed that her right hand was crushed and that she suffers from numbness and a crepitus in the first finger of her right hand. Hall also complained of difficulty writing, driving and opening jars. Hall's hand surgeon believed that she will most likely require two series of steroid injections into the right hand and exploratory surgery to try to treat the crepitus.

Other Information

The court ruled that strict liability did not apply because buffalo are not wild animals. As to Hall's other claims, the court determined that Hall was 70 percent liable and Casa de Fruta was 30 percent liable.


#117668

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390