This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Right of Publicity
Internet Law

Shirley Jones, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Corbis Corp.

Published: Sep. 17, 2011 | Result Date: May 25, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:10-cv-08668-SVW-CW Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jay B. Ross

Robert G. Klein
(Law Office of Robert G Klein)

Grant A. Carlson

Arthur S. Gold


Defendant

Kathryn J. Fritz

Laurence F. Pulgram
(Fenwick & West LLP)

Theis Finley

Leslie A. Kramer


Facts

Shirley Jones was best known as the mother in the 1970s show "The Partridge Family." She sued Corbis Corp., a distributor of copyrighted digital photographic images that it displays and offers for license on its websites in the form of an online catalog.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Jones sued on behalf of herself and a purported class of plaintiffs, and contended that Corbis' display of and license of the copyrights to photographs in images in which she appears violated her right of publicity under California law. She argued that the scope of her consent to being photographed and having her image distributed was limited to the efforts of the individual photographers and did not extend to Corbis' display of images to solicit sales of the images and to any subsequent license of the images.

Result

The court granted summary judgment for Corbis on Jones' individual claims, finding that she had consented to the distribution of the images of her at issue. Judge Stephen V. Wilson found that it was "undisputed that Jones voluntarily posed for photographers" with the knowledge that the photographers would display those images to prospective buyers, and that for over 40 years she did not object to this, knowing that the photographers would work with others to distribute the photographs. Having granted summary judgment, the court held that Jones' motion for class certification was moot, but also concluded that class certification would be inappropriate given lack of typicality. The Court subsequently awarded Corbis attorney fees and costs in excess of $350,000.


#117987

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390