This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Disability Discrimination
Age Discrimination

Lorie Bock v. City of Healdsburg

Published: Sep. 24, 2011 | Result Date: Apr. 26, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SCV-244425 Verdict –  Defense

Court

Sonoma Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gordon J. Fine


Defendant

Adrienne M. Moran


Experts

Plaintiff

Michael W. Shifflett
(medical)

Bruce Anderson
(medical)

Margo Rich Ogus Ph.D.
(technical)

Facts

In 1999, the City of Healdsburg hired Lorie Bock as a meter reader, and by 2007, she made $88,000 (salary and benefits) for working 16 days per month, under an at-will employment contract.

In Sept. 2007, a new assistant city manager informed Bock that either the position would be changed to fit within the pay scale, or she could work as an independent contractor for $80,000. Bock left her employment in Dec., after declining the options.

Bock then sued the City for disability, gender, and age discrimination, harassment, and whistleblowing activity. Her claims of discrimination, failure to accommodate, failure to engage in the interactive process, disability, and whistleblowing were heard by the jury.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that defendant forced her to leave her position due to her age, gender, and disability. She further alleged that she was forced to leave because she did not want to work at the lower pay rate.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant denied wrongdoing, claiming that plaintiff was fired for a justified reason, and was making money beyond the pay scale. Further, defendant claimed that plaintiff refused three different options before quitting.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded $950,00, and defendant offered $50,000.

Damages

Plaintiff requested over $1.4 million.

Injuries

Plaintiff claimed emotional distress and psychological injury.

Result

The jury found in favor of the defense.

Other Information

A cost memorandum was filed by the City for about $19,000. Bock has filed an appeal.

Deliberation

two hours

Poll

10-2

Length

12 days


#118017

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390