This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Age Discrimination
Retaliation

Donna Leek, Cynthia Buschmann, John Borden, Lawrence Leonardo v. Auburn Honda, Jay Cooper

Published: Oct. 1, 2011 | Result Date: Jun. 16, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 21570 and 21571 Verdict –  Defense

Court

Placer Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Martin F. Jennings


Defendant

John A. Britton

Daniel P. Costa
(The Costa Law Firm)


Experts

Plaintiff

John D. Hancock
(John D. Hancock Law Group PLLC) (technical)

Facts

Four former employees of Auburn Honda sued the company and its president, Jay Cooper, alleging age discrimination. Plaintiff Leonardo also alleged a cause of action for violation of the California Family Rights Act and retaliation. Each employee when hired was over the age of 40. All four employees were terminated from their employment. Their cases were consolidated by stipulation between the attorneys.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The employees alleged that they were terminated as part of a scheme to decrease the company's health insurance costs by terminating older employees. The plaintiffs' ages ranged from 49 to 66 years old. Plaintiffs also alleged retaliation.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Auburn Honda alleged the defense of business necessity due to the economy and sharp decline in sales, necessitating a restructure in its workforce. It also alleged that each worker was terminated for legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought $2 million in damages for loss of wages and commissions, emotional distress, attorney fees and costs, as well as punitive damages.

Injuries

Plaintiffs suffered from emotional distress and loss of wages.

Result

The jury rendered a unanimous defense verdict.

Other Information

Prior to trial, defendant Cooper obtained a judgment in his favor against all four plaintiffs by way of motion for summary judgment. The Court found that Cooper was not the "employer" of any of the employees.

Deliberation

two hours

Poll

12-0

Length

11 days


#118088

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390