This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Christopher Upham v. Helena F. Fox, individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Peter M. Fox, Deceased, and as Guardian Ad Litem for Rebecca H. Fox and Robert G. Fox, Minors, and Does 1 through 100

Published: Mar. 7, 2015 | Result Date: Jul. 2, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:13-cv-03377-MMC Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Daniel P. White


Defendant

Jeffrey S. Lyons


Facts

Christopher Upham filed a lawsuit against Helena Fox, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of Peter Fox.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that in 1991, the decedent, Peter Fox convinced him to invest $300,000 in a real estate project in Costa Rica. Plaintiff further alleged that after plaintiff made his investment, the decedent used his funds for improper purposes unrelated to the agreed upon development. Plaintiff further alleged that the defendant promised to sign a tolling agreement.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued that plaintiff had previously brought four unsuccessful lawsuits relating to the same subject matter. Defendant further argued that Peter Fox died in 2001 and plaintiff's claims were time-barred.

Result

The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss without leave to amend. The court found, in part, that the tolling agreement relied upon by plaintiff expired in September 2010, and did not make any of his causes of action for accounting, unjust enrichment, injunction, and constructive trust timely. The court also found that plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, conversion, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, concealment of material facts, and breach of fiduciary duty were identical to the claims plaintiff made in his lawsuits filed in 1995, 1999 and 2008 and such suits were all dismissed. The court held that these causes of action were also time-barred.


#118181

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390