This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Federal Employers' Liability Act
Dangerous Condition

Juan Estrada v. BNSF Railway Company

Published: Feb. 28, 2015 | Result Date: Aug. 27, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 39-2011-00259911-CU-PO-STK Verdict –  $3,508,380

Court

San Joaquin Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Anthony S. Petru
(Hildebrand, McLeod & Nelson LLP)


Defendant

Jeremy J. Schroeder
(Schroeder, Schaff & Low Inc.)

Jacob D. Flesher
(Flesher, Schaff & Schroeder Inc.)


Experts

Plaintiff

Roland Winter
(medical)

Brian C. Davis
(medical)

John K. Bob
(medical)

Raymond A. Duffany
(technical)

Facts

Juan Estrada sued BNSF Railway Co.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff, a trainman for defendant, was working at the "Mormon Yard" in Stockton when he stepped into a hole in a walkway at the railway. Plaintiff injured his left ankle as a result, and sued defendant for premises liability. Plaintiff accused defendant of negligently maintaining the premises, arguing that the lack of lighting and unsafe walkway created a dangerous condition. Plaintiff alleged that defendant was fully aware of the poorly maintained walkways.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended it was not negligent. Defendant contended the California Public Utility Commission walkway standards, General Order 118, did not apply to the area where plaintiff was injured, so the subject area did not require a "walkway;" defendant won a nonsuit motion on that claim. Defendant further contended the area where plaintiff was injured was reasonably safe had plaintiff exercised care while walking, including using his employer-provided lantern. Defendant argued it was not negligent because it provided plaintiff a reasonably safe workplace.

Injuries

Estrada tore a ligament in his ankle and underwent surgery to repair it. Despite the surgery, plaintiff claimed he continued to experience chronic pain, bone issues, swelling and other symptoms. He underwent a second surgery to repair it, but claimed he continued to experience problems.

Result

The jury found both parties partially at fault for the accident. It attributed 80 percent of fault to BNSF and the rest to Estrada. It then awarded him $3,508,383 in damages, which included $208,383 for past economic loss for wages and fringe benefits, $350,000 for past non-economic, pain and suffering damages, $1.75 million in future pain and suffering, and $1.2 million for loss of earning capacity. The award was reduced to $2,806,706 based on Estrada's comparative fault.

Deliberation

two days

Length

two weeks


#118213

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390