This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Antitrust
Sherman Antitrust Act
Cartwright Act

People of The State of California v. eBay Inc.

Published: Oct. 12, 2013 | Result Date: Sep. 27, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:12cv5874 Bench Decision –  Dismissal with Leave

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Nicole S. Gordon

Kathleen E. Foote
(Office of the Attorney General)


Defendant

Kirby D. Behre
(Miller, Chevalier & Chartered)

Thomas P. Brown
(Brown Gitt Law Group ALC)

Mary Jean Moltenbrey


Facts

Executives from eBay Inc. entered into an informal agreement with Scott Cook, founder and Chairman of the Executive Committee of Intuit Inc. In November 2005, an eBay executive wrote to Cook about a potential hire from Intuit. The potential hire had contacted eBay concerning a job. The executive and Cook then agreed to an informal policy where eBay would not actively recruit from Intuit without first informing Intuit, and Intuit would do the same thing in return.

The policy was implemented by August 2006, when eBay considered hiring an Intuit employee, but decided against it due to the agreement. Both eBay and Intuit communicated regularly regarding employment offers made to each other's employees, and had the general effect of a "no hiring" policy.

The Dept. of Justice investigated the companies policies, and in 2009, the investigation into the hiring agreements became public. The People of the State of California then filed suit against eBay.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs argued that eBay and Intuit's hiring agreement violated the Sherman Act, the Cartwright Act, California Business and Professions Code, and the California Unfair Competition Law. Among other things, the plaintiffs claimed that eBay continued to follow its informal agreement with Intuit, even after learning that it was being investigated by the Dept. of Justice.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
eBay moved to dismiss, arguing that the plaintiffs had failed to state a claim, because they had not established a conspiracy or any harm to competition. eBay argued that even when the Dept. of Justice began its investigation that it did not necessarily mean that its actions were illegal.

Result

The court granted a dismissal with leave to amend.


#118381

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390