TREO Maintenance Association v. Brookfield Woodbury LLC
Published: Nov. 2, 2013 | Result Date: Oct. 16, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 30-2009-00312036 Bench Decision – $2,339,540
Court
Orange Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Michael D. Turner
(Kasdan, LippSmith, Weber & Turner LLP)
Bryan M. Zuetel
(Kasdan, Lippsmith, Weber & Turner LLP)
Defendant
Shawn Morris
(Morris Sullivan and Lemkul)
Facts
Treo Maintenance Association filed a construction defect lawsuit against Brookfield Homes and various subcontractors, based on allegations of substandard work. Treo was a development designed and built by two of Brookfield's subsidiaries.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs alleged that the development had a variety of construction problems in common areas, including concrete walks, stucco patio walls, and front entrances. After Brookfield failed to take action during a mandatory 180-day dispute resolution period, the plaintiffs proceeded to litigation, arguing that Brookfield had ignored their requests for assistance and repairs.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Brookfield contended that the development's problems were not its responsibilities, and were caused by things such as the soil.
Result
The plaintiffs were awarded $2,339,538.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390