This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Deed of Trust
Forged Document

Scherree Holloman Dixon and Rose A. Holloman v. Alfredo C. Holloman

Published: Apr. 18, 2015 | Result Date: Mar. 10, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BP138678 Bench Decision –  Respondent

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Petitioner

George M. Halimi


Respondent

David J. Prager


Experts

Respondent

James A. Blanco
(technical)

Facts

Petitioners Scherree Holloman Dixon and Rose A. Holloman filed a petition against their brother respondent Alfredo C. Holloman in relation to their late father's trust.

Contentions

PETITIONER'S CONTENTIONS:
Petitioners claimed they had 50 percent interest in a residence owned by their late father. Petitioners claimed that their signature on the deed transferring their interests in the residence to the trust was forged by respondent.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:
Respondent claimed he was named as successor trustee and sole beneficiary to their late father's trust, and that petitioners had signed a deed transferring their interests in the residence into the trust. Respondent contended that the deed was not forged and the signatures were not forged, but were genuine. Petitioners later admitted that their signatures were genuine.

Respondent argued that by the terms of the trust, after their father died, respondent took sole title to the residence.

Settlement Discussions

Two settlement conferences were held, in which petitioners demanded their original 50 percent interest in the residence and respondent offered nothing.

Result

The court granted respondent's motion for judgment under CCP Sec.631.8.

Other Information

Respondent filed a Memorandum of Costs in the amount of $2,586. FILING DATE: Jan. 14, 2013.


#118891

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390