Scherree Holloman Dixon and Rose A. Holloman v. Alfredo C. Holloman
Published: Apr. 18, 2015 | Result Date: Mar. 10, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: BP138678 Bench Decision – Respondent
Court
L.A. Superior Central
Attorneys
Petitioner
Respondent
Experts
Respondent
James A. Blanco
(technical)
Facts
Petitioners Scherree Holloman Dixon and Rose A. Holloman filed a petition against their brother respondent Alfredo C. Holloman in relation to their late father's trust.
Contentions
PETITIONER'S CONTENTIONS:
Petitioners claimed they had 50 percent interest in a residence owned by their late father. Petitioners claimed that their signature on the deed transferring their interests in the residence to the trust was forged by respondent.
RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:
Respondent claimed he was named as successor trustee and sole beneficiary to their late father's trust, and that petitioners had signed a deed transferring their interests in the residence into the trust. Respondent contended that the deed was not forged and the signatures were not forged, but were genuine. Petitioners later admitted that their signatures were genuine.
Respondent argued that by the terms of the trust, after their father died, respondent took sole title to the residence.
Settlement Discussions
Two settlement conferences were held, in which petitioners demanded their original 50 percent interest in the residence and respondent offered nothing.
Result
The court granted respondent's motion for judgment under CCP Sec.631.8.
Other Information
Respondent filed a Memorandum of Costs in the amount of $2,586. FILING DATE: Jan. 14, 2013.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390