This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Constitutional Law
ADA
Assault and Battery

John Doe, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Guardian Doe v. The Learner-Centered School Inc., Antioch Charter Academy II, Michelle Mankewich, Marianne Dubitsky, Jeannie Dubitsky, Julie Fajeau, and Does 1 through 50

Published: Apr. 18, 2015 | Result Date: Feb. 2, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIVMSC13-01728 Settlement –  $250,000

Court

Contra Costa Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mary P. Carey

Larry E. Cook


Defendant

Paul C. Minney
(Young, Minney & Corr LLP)

Rachael B. Tillman

William J. Trinkle
(Young, Minney & Corr LLP)


Facts

John Doe, a minor, sued The Learner-Centered School Inc., Antioch Charter Academy II, Michelle Mankewich, Marianne Dubitsky, Jeannie Dubitsky, and Julie Fajeau.

Plaintiff was a student at a charter school in Antioch.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that his teacher duct-taped his mouth while another student held him down under a chair. Plaintiff was then publicly ridiculed by his classmates. Plaintiff, who suffered from asthma, claimed he suffered an attack as a result of the teacher's conduct and the public humiliation. Plaintiff further alleged that the school administrators failed to report the incident and/or take proper action.

Plaintiff asserted causes of action for unreasonable seizure and excessive force, supervisory liability, violations of the Bane Act, violation of the Ralph Act, violations of the Unruh Act and the Disabled Persons Act, Title II of the ADA, assault and battery, false imprisonment; intentional infliction of emotional distress, aiding and abetting, civil conspiracy, negligent infliction of emotional distress, negligence, negligent supervision, negligent hiring, training, supervision and retention; premises liability, and negligence per se.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed plaintiff's complaint lacked evidentiary support. Defendants contended that plaintiff's claim for damages was unsupported by any evidence and any treatment plaintiff received was insignificant.

According to defendant, despite plaintiff's lack of evidence, there was value in eliminating the risk of substantial attorney fees if even minor damages were found.

Result

Defendants' insurance carrier agreed to pay $250,000 in settlement.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Aug. 8, 2013.


#118898

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390