This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumers Legal Remedies Act
Unfair Competition

Julian Engel v. Novex Biotech LLC, et al.

Published: Apr. 18, 2015 | Result Date: Feb. 25, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:14-cv-03457-MEJ Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Lindsey M. Gomez-Gray

Stewart M. Weltman
(Siprut PC)

Elaine A. Ryan
(Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint PC)

Manfred P. Muecke
(Manfred APC)

Patricia N. Syverson
(Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint PC)


Defendant

Jason M. Kerr

Steven W. Garff
(Price Parkinson & Kerr PLLC)

Jeremy N. Lateiner
(Goodwin Procter LLP)

Mark J. Williams

Christopher B. Sullivan

Rollin B. Chippey II


Facts

Julian Engel sued Novex Biotech LLC and GNC Corp., related to the over-the-counter supplement, "Growth Factor-9."

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that he purchased the product, which was manufactured by defendants in reliance to defendants' claims that it was an over-the-counter amino acid supplement that can increase human growth hormone, or HGH, levels by 682 percent. Plaintiff claimed that such representations were false, misleading, and/or deceptive.

Plaintiff asserted claims for violation of California's Unfair Competition Law and California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that plaintiff failed to demonstrate that its claims were false. Alternatively, defendants argued that plaintiff's claims must be dismissed because the law provided no private right of action for his allegation of a purported lack of scientific substantiation claim.

Result

The court granted defendants' motion to dismiss because Engel failed to state a claim for relief.

Other Information

FILING DATE: July 30, 2014.


#118905

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390